|
Congress and
the President had a golden opportunity to make a
master stroke for Seniors. Imagine,
prescription coverage for all Medicare recipients! An
older American could rise up each day with one less
worry: at least the meds would be covered. Finally we
would have caught up with the rest of the civilized
world in providing total care for at least one portion
of our population. The lead weight that hung over the
heads of Seniors for so long would disappear.
Life-saving drugs could now be had by all. For some
it would mean funds are now there to buy more
nutritious foods. For others, the thermostat could go
up a few degrees in the winter. For still more it
would mean the ability to gas up the car, or meet the
apartment rent without fear. Perhaps the aging pet
could see the vet for the first time in years. Just
having the weight of fear removed would add spring to
the step, and hope for the future. Seniors, including
this one, would lift up this Republican Congress and
this President as heroes. Never mind "nucular" and "reconize."
Forget about "Abramoff", "Tom DeLay", and "CIA agent
out-ing". This administration and this
( at the time of passage of the program)
congress would have been elevated in the hearts of
Seniors forever.
So then, what have they
done? They have given us Part "D". "D" is a near
failing grade in most settings, and also in this one.
At best
it is a "stingy" program for Seniors, riddled with
confusion and the opportunity for greed on the part of
insurers and drug companies. But at least it is a
beginning toward prescription coverage; one that
perhaps can be rehabilitated.
At
the worst it becomes a government budget
buster, (the administration said
it would cost $400 billion over 10 years, while the
Congressional Budget Office says it will be three
times that amount--$1.2 trillion.) But it
still fails
to meaningfully provide the valuable medications
Seniors will need in the future. My fear is that the
drug and insurance companies will use it as a wild,
drunken party, and the conservative elements in
Congress will kill it completely? Even now we are
hearing about huge prices being charged Seniors for
drugs purchased in the "doughnut hole." Previously,
Seniors may have purchased these drugs for much less
at Canadian Pharmacies (where the country actually
negotiates for lower prices), or were offered
discounts by manufacturers based on income levels.
Many drug companies have now taken back the offer of
these discounts. So many are now at risk, doing
without critical drugs they cannot afford in the
doughnut hole, waiting for the program to start over
again each January.
So what are the basics
of Part "D"?
The bill
signed by President Bush is 411 pages long, and
takes a CIA decoding team to understand. Do we dare
try to summarize it on one page?
THE BASIC PLAN
So what are the basics
of Part "D"?
The bill
signed by President Bush is 411 pages long, and
takes a CIA decoding team to understand. Do we dare
try to summarize it on one page?
Under Medicare Part D, private insurance companies
(Prescription Drug Plans, called PDPs, or existing
Medicare Choice plans, which will be renamed Medicare
Advantage plans) will enter into contracts with the
Department of Health and Human Services to provide
insurance for prescription drugs. The coverage and
requirements, such as use of formulary drugs, under
the plans will vary by region to reflect differences
in provider costs and patient demo- graphics. In 2006,
the premium averaged $35 a month ($420 a year) , and
by 2008 this has gone over $40.
In 2008:
*First the enrollee pays a $275 yearly deductible.
* Next Medicare
pays 75 percent of drug costs of the next 2250
(another $558.75 out of pocket).
*Next, the enrollee pays 100
percent of costs until total drug costs
reach 5,726.25 (another $3,216.25 out of pocket
in the doughnut hole).
*We have now reached what
Medicare calls the "stop-loss"
threshold. From this point, thru the end of the
calendar year, Medicare pays approximately 95 percent of
your drug costs.
*That
means the Part D catastrophic protection will not
begin until the individual's total spending reaches
$4,050 , not counting the $420 or so annual premium.
The premium will increase over time according to a formula similar
to the one used by Medicare to regulate Part B
premiums. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO)
expects the average premium to rise from $35 to $58 a
month between 2006 and 2013.
The plan
deductible, initial benefit limit and
stop-loss threshold will each be indexed to the
growth in per capita Part D drug spending by Medicare
beneficiaries. Since such spending is expected to rise
much faster than the rate of inflation, the CEO
believes that by 2013 the Plan deductible will
increase to $466, the initial benefit limit
will rise to $4,000 and the out-of-pocket stop-loss
threshold will increase to $6,400.
The
legislation bans Medigap prescription drug policies
for anyone using Part D. As a result, many seniors
will actually spend more on drugs than they would
without Part D. Medigap policies for Parts A and B of
Medicare will remain legal.
In
order to encourage employers who already provide drug
coverage to Medicare-eligible seniors to continue
doing so, the law authorizes subsidies and tax
benefits worth an estimated $86 billion for such
employers. Public employers like the federal
government will be eligible for these subsidies,
though at the moment it is not clear who will receive them-the
FEHBP plans or employing agencies (like the USPS).
2006, 2007, 2008
This is
how it looks in Chart Form :
2006
|
AMOUNT & ITEM |
WHAT YOU PAY |
WHAT MEDICARE PAYS |
|
$420 PREMIUMS
(varies) |
$420
|
$0 |
|
$250 DEDUCTIBLE |
$250
|
$0 |
|
(25% / 75%)
NEXT $2,000 |
$500
|
$1,500 |
|
$2850" DOUGHNUT
HOLE" |
$2,850 |
$0
|
|
TOTAL |
$4,020
|
$1,500 |
|
SO UNTIL $5,520
IS SPENT, YOUR COST IS $4,020 ($3,600 if not
counting premiums) |
|
AFTER THAT YOU
PAY $2 FOR EACH GENERIC, OR $5 FOR EACH BRAND
NAME, OR 5% OF THE
TOTAL OF EACH PRESCRIPTION, WHICHEVER
IS THE HIGHER NUMBER. EXAMPLE: A $200 DRUG
COSTS YOU $10. THIS 5% ARRANGEMENT CONTINUES
ONLY UNTIL DECEMBER 31, 2006 |
|
ON 1/1/07 IT
ALL BEGINS OVER AGAIN, WITH HIGHER PREMIUMS
AND DEDUCTIBLE, AND A LARGER DOUGHNUT HOLE.
Remember, if you
have been in Part D for less than a full year
in 2006, being in for a full 12 months in 2007
may mean that the doughnut hole takes
on a greater significance for you. |
| |
|
This is how it looks in Chart Form :
2007
|
|
AMOUNT & ITEM |
WHAT YOU PAY |
WHAT MEDICARE PAYS |
|
$420
PREMIUMS (varies) |
$420
|
$0 |
|
$265
DEDUCTIBLE |
$265
|
$0
|
|
(25% / 75%)
NEXT $2,135 |
$533.75 |
$1,601.25 |
|
$3,051.25
"DOUGHNUT HOLE" |
$3,051.25 |
$0
|
|
TOTAL |
$4,270
|
$1,601.25 |
|
SO UNTIL
$5,871.25 IS SPENT, YOUR COST IS $4,270.00
($3,850 if not counting premiums) |
|
AFTER THAT YOU
PAY $2.15 FOR EACH GENERIC, OR $5.35 FOR
EACH BRAND NAME, OR 5% OF THE TOTAL OF
EACH PRESCRIPTION, WHICHEVER IS THE HIGHER
NUMBER. EXAMPLE: A $200 DRUG COSTS YOU
$10.00. THIS 5% ARRANGEMENT CONTINUES ONLY
UNTIL DECEMBER 31, 2007 |
|
ON 1/1/08
IT ALL BEGINS OVER AGAIN, WITH HIGHER
PREMIUMS AND DEDUCTIBLE, AND A LARGER
DOUGHNUT HOLE.
Remember, if
you have been in Part D for less than a full
year in 2006, being in for a full 12 months
in 2007 may mean that the doughnut
hole takes on a greater significance for
you. |
|
|
This is how it looks in Chart Form :
2008 |
|
AMOUNT
& ITEM |
WHAT YOU
PAY |
WHAT
MEDICARE PAYS |
|
$420
PREMIUMS (varies) |
$420
|
$0 |
|
$275
DEDUCTIBLE |
$275
|
$0
|
|
(25% / 75%)
NEXT $2,235 |
$558.75
|
$1,676.25 |
|
$3216.25
"DOUGHNUT HOLE" |
$3,216.25 |
$0
|
|
TOTAL |
$4,470
|
$1,676.25 |
|
SO UNTIL
$6,146.25 IS SPENT, YOUR COST IS $4,470
($4,050 if not counting premiums) |
|
AFTER THAT
YOU PAY $2.25 FOR EACH GENERIC, OR $5.60
FOR EACH BRAND NAME, OR 5% OF THE
TOTAL OF EACH PRESCRIPTION,
WHICHEVER IS THE HIGHER NUMBER. EXAMPLE: A
$200 DRUG COSTS YOU $11.20. THIS SO-CALLED
"CATASTROPHIC COVERAGE" CONTINUES ONLY
UNTIL DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
ON 1/1/09
IT ALL BEGINS OVER AGAIN, WITH HIGHER
PREMIUMS AND DEDUCTIBLE, AND A LARGER
DOUGHNUT HOLE.
Remember, if
you have been in Part D for less than a
full year in 2007, being in for a full 12
months in 2008 may mean that the
doughnut hole takes on a greater
significance for you. |
|
THE PLAN IS INADEQUATE
Part
D benefits will cover only about one-fifth to
one-quarter of anticipated drug care costs over the
next decade. And the peculiar "doughnut" design, with
no benefits paid for costs between $2,250 and $5,100,
is confusing and costly to many seniors. Although the
plan helps some seniors facing catastrophic drug
expenses in any given year, most will see their out-
of-pocket expenses continue to rise since the
legislation fails to restrain sky-rocketing
pharmaceutical prices or curb the power of the few
large multinational drug companies that dominate the
marketplace. In fact, it
actually
prohibits Medicare from using its
purchasing
power to negotiate the best prices for the elderly
and effectively
blocks the
importation of
U.S.-made drugs from other countries where prices are
much
lower.
(We wonder who influenced THIS inclusion?)
HIDDEN
TREACHERY?
The
new law squanders considerable resources to bankroll
privatization experiments with Medicare Parts A & B.
Despite Medicare's record of low administrative
expenses and the failure of Medicare Choice (Part C)
in the past, the new law directs billions in subsidies
to HMOs and other private insurers to compete for
traditional Medicare program enrollees in six
metropolitan areas. These experiments, set to begin in
2010, and the introduction of means-testing for
setting premiums for Medicare Part B (higher income
retirees will pay higher premiums) have led many
critics to fear the gradual privatization of
Medicare. Do these guys really believe that private
companies will look after the well-being of Seniors
more faithfully than Social Security or Medicare. NOT
ON YOUR LIFE! We had better get on this fast.
PART "D" MUST
BE RE-DONE
Part D has been plagued
with problems from the start, many stemming from its
complexity. It's true that many seniors save money
with Part D, but millions of others are worse off. And
yet taxpayers could pay nearly $1.2 TRILLION for this
benefit in the plan's first 10 years.
Congress has to do better. There is a
solution. Congress should revamp Part D: Eliminate all
the private insurance plans, make prescription
coverage a simple, direct benefit from Medicare and
negotiate drug prices in bulk with the pharmaceutical
industry the way the Department of Veterans Affairs
does. Under this program, medications already cost
46% MORE
than the prices the Veterans Administration has
negotiated for its folks. I suspect that gap will
widen as lobbyists lurk around the pocketbooks of the
Congress.
YOU have the
power to assure that changes will be made in the
program. Go to the SeniorARK
"links"/"government" page. You will see links to
email the president, senators, and your
representative. They
DO pay
attention to these emails.
printer
friendly version
Also see:
Part
D In Chart Form,
All about Part D and Medicare,
Survive a Fall into the Doughnut Hole
Medicare Twilight Zone
|